“If the Palestinian people really wish to decide that they will battle to the very end to prevent partition or annexation of even an inch of their ancestral soil, then I have to concede that that is their right. I even think that a sixty-year rather botched experiment in marginal quasi-statehood is something that the Jewish people could consider abandoning. It represents barely an instant in our drawn-out and arduous history, and it's already been agreed even by the heirs of Ze'ev Jabotinsky that the whole scheme is unrealizable in 'Judaea and Samaria,' let alone in Gaza or Sinai. But it's flat-out intolerable to be solicited to endorse a side-by-side Palestinian homeland and then to discover that there are sinuous two-faced apologists explaining away the suicide-murder of Jewish civilians in Tel Aviv, a city which would be part of a Jewish state or community under any conceivable 'solution.' There's that word again...” ― Christopher Hitchens, Hitch 22: A Memoir
Há anónimos de uma imbecilidade tamanha que conseguem mesmo superar as armas de guerra contra a Palestina, mas sucede que o que fazem, como aquele supra, nesta caixa de comentários, não passa de uma mijinha lá no telhado (baixinho, baixinho) do reduto da coelheira (pensando que são chinchilas, cuja morte é francamente mais atroz: é pesquisar, oh anónimo).
Christopher Hitchens ? mais um propagandista americano a soldo do regime sionista. Só engana os parvos. Christopher Hitchens foi um defensor da invasão do Iraque de Saddam, querem mais exemplos?
5 comentários:
mensagensnanett
Acertou na mouche. A D. Ana Cristina como enveredou por outra rota vai ter de engolir os sapos, oh se vai!
“If the Palestinian people really wish to decide that they will battle to the very end to prevent partition or annexation of even an inch of their ancestral soil, then I have to concede that that is their right. I even think that a sixty-year rather botched experiment in marginal quasi-statehood is something that the Jewish people could consider abandoning. It represents barely an instant in our drawn-out and arduous history, and it's already been agreed even by the heirs of Ze'ev Jabotinsky that the whole scheme is unrealizable in 'Judaea and Samaria,' let alone in Gaza or Sinai. But it's flat-out intolerable to be solicited to endorse a side-by-side Palestinian homeland and then to discover that there are sinuous two-faced apologists explaining away the suicide-murder of Jewish civilians in Tel Aviv, a city which would be part of a Jewish state or community under any conceivable 'solution.' There's that word again...”
― Christopher Hitchens, Hitch 22: A Memoir
Há anónimos de uma imbecilidade tamanha que conseguem mesmo superar as armas de guerra contra a Palestina, mas sucede que o que fazem, como aquele supra, nesta caixa de comentários, não passa de uma mijinha lá no telhado (baixinho, baixinho) do reduto da coelheira (pensando que são chinchilas, cuja morte é francamente mais atroz: é pesquisar, oh anónimo).
Às tantas, enganei-me: seriam martas, arminhos?
Talvez o anónimo esclareça, tamanha a sabedoria que evidencia.
Christopher Hitchens ? mais um propagandista americano a soldo do regime sionista. Só engana os parvos. Christopher Hitchens foi um defensor da invasão do Iraque de Saddam, querem mais exemplos?
Enviar um comentário